In a speech to the International
Republican Institute in May 2005, George
Bush said democracies were built on
common foundations and included
fundamental rights: "First, all
successful democracies need freedom of
speech, with a vibrant free press that
informs the public, ensures
transparency, and prevents authoritarian
backsliding."
Given the US has spent a fortune trying
to nurture a free press in Iraq, you
would hope they might lead by example.
The revelations that the US military
"information operations" troops have
been paying Iraqi newspapers to publish
stories they wrote themselves are alarming.
This is not how you establish a democracy.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the
US military has been working through a
Washington defence contractor, the
Lincoln Group, which translated their
stories into Arabic, and peddled them to
media outlets, offering to pay money and
posing as freelance journalists or
advertising executives. The stories were
critical of insurgents, praised US
attempts to restore democracy to the
country and were mostly presented as
independent, unbiased news reports. They
have also been paying monthly stipends
to some Iraqi journalists.
Perhaps it should come as no surprise -
this Administration has been caught out
concocting stories before. Earlier this
year, reports emerged of the US
Government paying newspaper columnists
to support their policies, and issuing
news tapes featuring fake reporters
filmed talking about current events -
the footage was given free to television
stations across America. Some stations
played them without attribution. In
2002, the Pentagon closed the
Orwellian-sounding Office of Strategic
Influence, established just a year
before, after stories ran in the press
alleging they had developed plans to
place false stories in the global media.
But the main reason these recent reports
are such a shame is because they will
destroy the credibility of US efforts to
train and support a free and independent
media within Iraq, casting suspicion
over any Iraqi journalists trained by,
or working with, Americans.
Working conditions are difficult,and
dangerous enough, for journalists in Iraq.
Recent research by a New York Times
foreign correspondent, David Rohde, at
Harvard University this year found that
while the US spent $200 million ($267.4
million) in two years on media
development in Iraq - six times more
than it has ever spent on this elsewhere
- efforts to establish a free press have
largely failed.
He attributes this to the closure or
banning of media outlets in Iraq in 2003
and 2004 by the Coalition Provisional
Authority and Iraq Governing Council, a
failure to train privately owned media,
counter-productive attempts to influence
coverage and a lack of security for
journalists. According to Freedom House,
a non-profit, non-partisan monitoring
group, the rating of press freedom in
Iraq has declined since 2003, largely
due to "instability, escalating violence
and unanswered questions about the power
and role of new institutions created to
regulate the media".
Rohde concluded: "Two years after the
invasion of Iraq, the country has not
become the symbol of press freedom that
American officials envisioned. Indeed,
American policies, particularly those of
the CPA, have curtailed the
establishment of a free media in the
country and undermined the broader cause
of spreading democracy in the Middle East."
Just a few days ago the US Defence
Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, was crowing
about the success of the media campaign
in Iraq, saying the hundreds of TV and
radio stations and newspapers that
sprang up between 2003 and 2004 were a
"relief valve" for the Iraqis.
It's true that this boom, along with the
sprouting of satellite dishes and
internet connections was a welcome sign
of the end of Saddam Hussein's rule.
But these privately owned companies are
precisely those the US failed to
support, when they chose to concentrate
instead on reforming a large state-owned
network. You cannot help but wonder if,
given the frustrations of their overt
press strategy, the US has turned to
other covert operations.
There have certainly been historical
precedents for this. One unnamed
military official told reporters that
Baghdad's "Information Operations Task
Force" has bought an Iraqi television
station and newspaper, which have been
running pro-US reports. He would not
reveal which ones for fear of insurgent
attacks. How unnerving for the
increasingly suspicious Iraqi readers.
No wonder the Arab News cried "Hands off
our press!"
Bush was right - a vibrant, transparent
free press is critical to the health of
democracy in Iraq. It's also critical to
the health of democracy in the US.
Propaganda is just about the worst form
of "authoritarian backsliding".
Email Julia Baird at: jbaird@smh.com.au